The younger set looks like the slightly better bet. Carlos Alcaraz, 20, is back at No. 1 and already a Grand Slam champion after winning last year’s U.S. Open. Holger Rune, 20 as well, beat Djokovic in Rome this week and has elastic limbs of his own. You can add Stefanos Tsitsipas, Casper Ruud, Jannik Sinner or even Daniil Medvedev, formerly allergic to clay, to the short list without ruling out a bigger surprise.
Nadal, absent from the draw for the first time nearly two decades, said he won’t watch it all from afar, but he will be keeping tabs.
Last year, he drew some criticism from pro-Djokovic quarters for emphasizing that no tournament is bigger than any single player when Djokovic missed the 2022 Australian Open after arriving in Melbourne unvaccinated for the coronavirus and was deported.
“The Australian Open will be great Australian Open with or without him,” Nadal said before winning it himself.
But he was clearly eager to be consistent on Thursday.
“My speech is not going to change,” he said. “Roland Garros will be always Roland Garros with or without me without a doubt.”
He continued: “Players stay for a while, and they leave. Tournaments stay forever.”
That is true and will seem truer still when some other man with red-stained socks is crowned champion next month in Paris. But there can also be no doubt that Nadal and Roland Garros will be linked as long as there is a Roland Garros.
Related Posts
Manchester City manager Manuel Pellegrini praises magnificent goalkeeper Joe Hart
House Democrats Move to Force a Debt-Limit Increase as Default Date Looms
Christian Benteke doesn’t excite Liverpool fans like Roberto Firmino even though 95 per cent have never seen him play, but I worry Belgian won’t be suited to Reds style
Bell drops the gloves with Rogers over GamePlus app
Newcastle players train under grey skies on Spain training camp… as Steve McClaren claims Jonjo Shelvey will silence his critics
Which Should You Use? Project Management Tools vs. To-Do List Managers