11222017

Brain map carves cortex into twice as many areas

brain mapImage copyright
M Glasser, D Van Essen/Washington University

Image caption

Both brain activity and its physical properties were used to create the map

A new brain map, based on multiple scans of more than 400 individuals, has carved the “cortex” into 180 different compartments – 97 of which are new.

This crumpled outer layer of the brain is home to our advanced cognition, perception and movement.

It has been mapped in various ways for centuries, but this new effort is a landmark attempt at a definitive, modern atlas for neuroscientists.

The work is reported in Nature and the data is available to scientists online.

It the most significant result to date from the Human Connectome Project, a US-led collaboration aimed at unravelling the wiring of the human brain and how it affects behaviour.

‘Mammoth effort’

Dr Emma Robinson, now at Imperial College London, is a co-author of the Nature paper and was part of the Oxford University team which built software to analyse the project’s huge streams of data.

“This is the culmination of the entire HCP project that we’ve been working towards,” she told BBC News.

“This paper is really a mammoth effort by Matthew Glasser and David Van Essen (of Washington University in St Louis, Missouri) – manually labelling brain regions, but also pulling together all the streams that we’ve been working on, trying to collect incredibly high quality images and state of the art imaging processing techniques.”

The team used several different types of information, derived from lengthy scanning sessions of 210 people, to define the boundaries of 180 areas in each brain hemisphere.

To begin with, there were physical properties to consider – such as the amount of myelin, the substance which wraps nerve fibres, detected throughout the cortex; or variations in the folding and the thickness of the cortex.

But the researchers also looked at brain activity. Which regions were activated by particular tasks – reading as opposed to gambling, for example? And to what extent was activity in one area correlated and coordinated with activity elsewhere?

Image copyright
M Glasser, D Van Essen/Washington University

Image caption

These are the areas that responsed to a language-based task (following a story)

After using automatic computational tools to separate those 180 areas, the team set about testing and confirming the results on a fresh sample of 210 individual brains.

There were, perhaps inevitably, some differences between individuals, but brain researcher have welcomed the map as the most detailed human brain atlas to date.

Prof Tim Behrens, another computational neuroscientist at the University of Oxford, is involved in the HCP but was not an author on the new paper – which he described as “awe inspiring”.

“Obviously there are a bunch of people who have done parcellations before. But this one is extraordinary because of the level of precision.

“Every one of those 180 areas in this paper is described in detail – its relation to the previous literature, its functional properties, its anatomical properties… Nobody will do as good a job as this for a long time.

“It will now be the parcellation that is used by all of neuroscience, I would think.”

Image copyright
M Glasser, D Van Essen/Washington University

Image caption

The motor cortex (top centre), with its longer-reaching connections, contains more myelin

Prof Simon Eickhoff studies brain organisation at the University of Dusseldorf in Germany and was not involved in the research.

He told the BBC the new map was “a really big step forward” and was built on an impressive variety of data.

“It’s very useful. It betters the descriptions that have been available up till now,” Prof Eickhoff said.

But he cautioned against describing the 97 freshly delineated regions as “new areas”.

“If you look at the classical brain maps, even from the 19th century – they were whole-brain maps; they had a label for every spot on the cortex. Any part of the brain has already been looked at.

“[This work] certainly defines something clearly, where knowledge has been imprecise and maybe contradictory. But ‘new’ is a tricky term.”

Prof Behrens, meanwhile, said that beyond the map’s utility for neuroscientists and neurosurgeons, it would change the way he thinks about the human brain.

“It conceptually changes things. Brain areas are not coarsely divided with, say, 50 pieces that we need to figure out what they’re doing.

“As you get more and better data, you can subdivide it further and further – and we should be thinking about the brain in this much more granular way.”

Follow Jonathan on Twitter

What Next?

Recent Articles

Leave a Reply

You must be Logged in to post comment.